Home | News | MNAAP Newsletter

MNAAP Newsletter

Minnesota Pediatrician is published quarterly and is written by pediatricians for pediatricians. The newsletter is mailed and emailed to over 1,000 members.

If you have a story idea or are interested in advertising, email chapter Communications Manager Bethany Venable.

September 23, 2019

Seventy-five percent of pregnancies among adolescents are unplanned and every day in the state of Minnesota, approximately eight adolescents become pregnant and six give birth. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and etonogestrel implants (Nexplanon), are the first-line contraceptive method for adolescents, yet fewer than 5 percent of adolescents ages 15-19 use these methods. In 2014, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) joined the Institute of Medicine, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist, and the American Academy of Family Medicine in recommending LARCs as first-line contraception for adolescents. Although pediatricians are well-positioned to increase adolescent LARC use, provider knowledge, attitudes and experience remain a barrier, resulting in missed opportunities to prevent teen pregnancy.

A multidisciplinary, trainee-led team from the University of Minnesota conducted a needs assessment among pediatric community clinicians and trainees. It revealed two key findings: (1) few pediatric providers in our community were providing LARCs, and (2) the vast majority (88 percent) of pediatric trainees desired LARC training, yet opportunities were limited.

To address this gap, in July 2018, the trainee-led team launched monthly LARC workshops for pediatric community clinicians and trainees. This free 3.5-hour workshop includes an interactive educational session on LARC methods, followed by hands-on etonogestrel implant (Nexplanon) training and certification.

To date, a total of 147 clinicians have participated in the LARC workshop – 52 medical residents and fellows (35 percent), 58 advanced practice providers (39 percent), and 19 attending physicians (13 percent). Clinicians who have attended the workshop report increased knowledge and comfort with LARC methods and are more likely to recommend and provide LARCs in their clinics.

We are all too familiar with the missed opportunities to prevent unplanned teen pregnancy and as pediatricians; we are uniquely positioned to make a difference.

We hope to see you at one of the upcoming trainings!

For more information and to sign up, please contact Alex Prince by email

Quick Facts: Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARCs)

They are the most effective form of reversible contraception.

There are very few contraindications.

They are safe and well-tolerated among adolescents.

Adolescents prefer LARCs compared to other contraceptive methods.

About the Authors

Taylor A. Argo, MD; Janna R. Gewirtz O’Brien MD, FAAP; Kathleen K. Miller, MD, FAAP; Emily Borman-Shoap MD, FAAP authored the content for this article.

Alexandra Prince, Tori Bahr, MD, Christy Boraas, MD, MPH, Nicole Chaisson, MD, MPH, collaborated on this project.

Many of us are members of the Minnesota Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (MNAAP) as well as National American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). However, until I started attending national AAP meetings on behalf of our chapter in my role as president – elect (VP) of the Minnesota Chapter, I really had no idea how the two were connected. Here is what I have learned:

The Minnesota Chapter of the AAP is a “stand-alone” not-for-profit organization in the state of Minnesota, and is the leading voice on children’s health and wellbeing in Minnesota, representing over 1,000 pediatricians practicing or residing in the state.

There are 10 districts in the AAP, representing all 50 states and six Canadian provinces.

Our chapter is part of District VI of the AAP – including eight other Midwest states and two Canadian provinces.

The District Chairpersons are each members of the National AAP Board of Directors. As a result, MNAAP has direct access to AAP leadership.

In addition to monthly District VI conference calls, there are two annual meetings that our chapter president, president-elect and executive director attend in Itasca, IL (west of Chicago) where the National AAP Headquarters is located:

The Annual Leadership Forum (ALF) in the spring, where all state, district, section, council and committee Leadership are present at this meeting. We meet with the other chapters in our district, hear presentations from national leadership and the AAP presidential candidates and discuss and vote on all the resolutions that are put forth by AAP members/chapters around the country.

The District VI meeting in August where all district chapter leadership and district leadership, as well as some national leadership attend. This meeting is smaller than the ALF and allows for more discussion time with chapters in your own district and one other district that is also in attendance. We also get to hear presentations from our national leadership, other speakers and again, the AAP presidential candidates.

MNAAP communicates and works closely with AAP on a number of issues involving education, advocacy and membership. With more than 500 employees, AAP is an incredible resource for chapter staff, volunteers and leaders.  Currently our chapter has four paid consultants – all of whom are part-time – including our executive director, foundation executive director (who handles state and community grant projects), communications manager and lobbyist. Everyone else, including our board and officers are volunteers.

There are three officers in our chapter: president, president-elect (vice president) and treasurer. These three officers, along with our executive director, past president, and two at-large members make up the executive committee of the board. Our board is made up of 25 elected pediatricians from around the state. There are also a number of chapter work groups and champions for various issues (e.g. Dental Champion, Early Childhood Education).

The chapter has 10 work group co-chairs overseeing the chapter’s priorities: policy, immunizations, child safety, poverty and disparities, and behavioral health.

The chapter has 11 chapter champions or liaisons to AAP on a number of issues, ranging from early childhood to breastfeeding to disaster preparedness.

The chapter has 22 members who serve in leadership roles on AAP committees, sections and councils.

Both our local chapter and the national AAP are dedicated to education and advocacy at the state and federal levels to improve the health and wellbeing of children.

If you want to know more, or are interested in becoming more involved with AAP at the chapter or national level, please reach out to either our president, Dr. Lori DeFrance or myself.


Sheldon Berkowitz, MD, FAAP

MNAAP President-Elect

Vijay Chawla, MD, FAAP

Children have many points of interaction with motor vehicles long before they themselves become licensed drivers, and as pediatricians we can help reinforce to their caregivers the many opportunities that exist to keep children safe. According to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS), 27 children and teens between the ages of 0 and 18 were killed in motor vehicle accidents in 2017, and more than 4,400 were injured.

Car Seat Safety

Perhaps the most obvious safety issue for children in a motor vehicle is how they ride in that car. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that all infants and toddlers should ride in a Rear-Facing Car Safety Seat until they are two years old or until they reach the highest weight or height allowed by their car safety seat’s manufacturer.

Often, parents or caregivers will ask about booster seats for older children. A child who is both under age 8 and shorter than 4 feet 9 inches is required to be fastened in a child safety seat that meets federal safety standards. Under this law, a child cannot use a seat belt alone until they are age 8, or 4 feet 9 inches tall. It is recommended to keep a child in a booster based on their height rather than their age. Check the instruction book or label of the child safety seat to be sure it is the right seat for a child’s weight and height.

Minnesota does not have a law prohibiting children from riding in the front seat. However, according to the Office of Traffic Safety, it is considered safest and the best practice to keep children in the back seat until they reach age 13.

You can recommend parents or caregivers visit for easy to find information. This website is maintained by the Minnesota Safety Council. The Minnesota Office of Traffic Safety also keeps a calendar of free car seat check opportunities under its “Child Passenger Safety” section of its website.

Unattended Minors in Motor Vehicles

Minnesota does not have specific laws that address the age at which a child may be left unattended in a motor vehicle. However, accidents can happen quickly, and young children lack the impulse control or decision making skills to keep themselves as safe as an adult caregiver can.

In addition to accidents, weather can affect the internal temperature of a motor vehicle quickly, and a child left unattended in a car may not be able to escape a vehicle that becomes too hot or too cold. The National Safety Council has recorded 6 child heatstroke deaths in vehicles in Minnesota since 1998, but any number is too great.

Remind parents and caregivers that leaving children unattended in motor vehicles is a decision that must be weighed carefully based on the child’s age, ability, and maturity, but that the best course of action is to not leave children unattended in a car.

Technology and Driving

Minnesota recently enacted a hands-free law on Aug. 1, which requires drivers to put down their phones and go hands-free while driving. This is excellent news for child passenger safety, because children involved in a distracted driving traffic accident are the unintended victim to an avoidable situation.

The new law allows drivers over 18 to use their cell phones to make calls, text, listen to music or podcasts and get directions, but only by voice commands or single-touch activation without holding the phone.

When talking with teen patients, remind them that the new hands-free law does not change anything for teens under 18 with a driver’s permit or provisional driver’s license: they cannot make or answer calls while driving (hand-held or hands-free).

The DPS has prepared several resources to help in educating patients and their caregivers about the new law, and these can be viewed on its website at

Driver Impairment

No driver should ever sit behind the wheel of a car while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and children should not be in the car with a driver who is impaired. In 2017, the DPS reported two Minnesota children between the ages of 0 and 18 were killed in alcohol-related car crashes, and 231 were injured in alcohol-related motor vehicle accidents.

For additional resources, visit: and click on free safety resources.


About the Author

Vijay Chawla, MD, FAAP, is a member of the MNAAP Child Safety Work Group. Dr. Chawla retired after practicing for 20 years at the Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea.

Sheldon Berkowitz, MD, FAAP

MNAAP President-Elect Sheldon Berkowitz, MD, FAAP, attended the May 2019 signing ceremony of the bill which formed the Rare Disease Advisory Council. His attendance was at the request of the family who advocated for its creation, and he shares these thoughts with Minnesota Pediatrician.

“I’m not sure if you remember me, but I am Chloe Barnes’ mother.” This was the beginning of an email I received in March 2019. To be honest, I vaguely remembered the name but once I looked up her medical record, it all came back. This family came to see me for a second opinion nine years earlier with concerns about their daughter’s lack of walking ability and muscle strength. I examined her and agreed with her parents that yes, her gross development was delayed and she had some hyptonia. I thought further testing was indicated. We talked about whether the parents wanted to have this done with their primary care physician (to whom I would send a copy of my notes) or have me start it, and they requested I order the tests. A neurology referral, brain MRI and subsequent workup showed that she had a severe neurologic disorder. She eventually underwent a bone marrow transplant, but succumbed to her disease a few months later. Other than the initial clinic visit and a preoperative exam for her MRI, along with a few other phone calls along the way, my involvement in her care was very limited.

Fast forward nine years to the email I received from her mom that ended with, “Thank you for your dedication to these little ones.” There were other emails we traded over the next two months, including one where this mom wrote me that “your clinical judgment gave Chloe a chance” and others where we discussed the bill she had been working on to get additional resources and funding for a Rare Disease Advisory Council from the Minnesota Legislature. We talked about how the Minnesota Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics had already signed a letter of support for the bill. Finally, I received an email inviting me to join the family and others for the signing of this bill by the governor. Next thing I knew, I found myself in the Minnesota Capitol Rotunda greeting Chloe’s mom with a big hug.

What I heard from her that day, as well as from Chloe’s father when I reintroduced myself to him at the actual

signing, was how significant my involvement had been for this family. They talked about how important my listening to their concerns and taking them seriously and then acting on them had been.

In addition, they talked about how even though their child eventually died from her disease, my assistance in getting a diagnosis made and treatment provided, gave them extra time with her and allowed them to feel that they did everything they could for her.

I write this not to pat myself on the back as I really don’t think I did anything that remarkable. But to this family I did, and that is a very humbling feeling. As pediatricians, we are allowed into family’s lives and learn intimate details about both their children and often the parents. We are expected to guard that information carefully and to act on it for the best interests of the child we are caring for. Sometimes, that relationship develops over years or decades, while other times it may be a single or a few visits and phone calls. We can never know what impact our involvement in a child or young patient or their family’s life will be. But we should always be aware that it may end up being an incredible experience for everyone involved and make sure we do everything we can to make that happen.

About the Author

Sheldon Berkowitz, MD, FAAP, is the president-elect of the MNAAP. Dr. Berkowitz is a pediatrician in the General Pediatrics Clinic in Minneapolis and also the Medical Director for Case Management, Utilization Management and Clinical Documentation Improvement for Children’s Minnesota.

September 18, 2019

The American Academy of Pediatrics has called upon pediatricians to take an active role in screening for food insecurity in clinical settings and connecting families to food resources. Implementation of screening for food insecurity has accelerated rapidly over the past few years, but many questions remain, including where and how to screen, and what to do once a family screens positive. Jonathan KenKnight, MD, FAAP, and Gretchen Gretchen J. Cutler, PhD, MPH, share screening practices from two different settings.

In the clinic | Dr. Jonathan KenKnight

As pediatricians, we are all acutely aware of the stress and burden food insecurity places on our patients and families, and we need to be screening for problems.  Bright Futures recommends routine screening for food scarcity along with other socioeconomic factors at our well visits. The Minnesota Department of Health also added this to its Child and Teen Checkup requirements in 2017.

At Essentia Health, where I practice in Duluth, we have developed an automated screening questionnaire that is given to families prior to well visits. These are completed in privacy after the patient is roomed.  Depending on responses, these are flagged for follow- up with our community health worker, who then reaches out to families to assist in finding resources.

Fortunately in Duluth, we have several food banks locally and many organizations built to help families address this increasingly common problem. However, given that we take care of a large area ranging from Northeastern Minnesota, Northern Wisconsin, and the upper peninsula of Michigan, sometimes finding local resources is challenging. Fortunately, we have a social worker present in our office space. She is available to speak with families and connect them with resources in person during the visit and can follow up as needed to ensure our children and families have access to food and any other social needs – housing, safety, etc. We also have pamphlets present in our exam rooms with lists of local resources that are freely available to take.

Jonathan KenKnight, MD, FAAP, is a pediatrician with Essentia Health in Duluth, MN.

In the emergency department | Gretchen Cutler, PhD, MPH

I’ve had the unique opportunity to co-lead a research project with Caitlin Caspi, ScD, from the University of Minnesota Department of Family Medicine and Community Health that has tried to tackle questions regarding food insecurity screening with a research team including investigators from Children’s Minnesota (Anupam Kharbanda, MD, MSc), the University of Minnesota (Marissa Hendrickson, MD), and HCMC (Diana Cutts, MD). This study was supported by a research grant from the University of Minnesota’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Child Health Collaborative Grant Program, a partnership between the University of Minnesota and Children’s Minnesota.

In February 2017, Children’s Minnesota started screening for food insecurity in our Minneapolis and St. Paul emergency departments (EDs) with the aim of examining a universal electronic medical record (EMR) based screening process along with a text message system for providing follow-up community food resource information.

The validated 2-item Hunger Vital Sign was embedded in the EMR along with other rooming assessment questions. After an 8-month period of verbal screening by nursing staff, only 4 percent of caregivers were screening positive, which was surprising as other studies have found food insecurity rates as high as 40 percent in urban pediatric EDs. Screening was also only being completed in a little over half of patient visits, and nursing staff was raising concerns about difficulties with asking questions directly as written and patient discomfort. We had chosen an EMR-based screening method in order to screen as many families as possible, but this method was not reaching all patients, and was not accurately identifying all families experiencing food insecurity. With a few months of study funding left, we decided to test whether the number of positive screens would go up if we switched to a private, electronic tablet-based method. Over a five-month period this new process resulted in a four-fold increase in the percentage of positive screens, increasing from 4 percent to 16 percent.

During the two-year study, we identified 2,272 families as food insecure and provided each with a food resource handout. A subset of 265 caregivers completed a more comprehensive screen, which showed that over half of these families were classified in the most severe category of food insecurity. These caregivers were also randomized to receive a food resource handout or a handout plus a series of text messages with community food resource information.

Food insecurity status was slightly improved in families at a three-month follow-up, but this did not differ by delivery method of food resource information.

The increase in screening for food insecurity in health care settings is a crucial step towards treating all factors that influence a child’s health, and our finding highlight the importance of choosing the correct screening method. Food insecurity is a stigmatizing condition, which can make verbal disclosure difficult, especially when children are present or in an ED setting when there is rarely an established relationship with a family. To accurately identify all families in need screening methods should be consistently monitored, adjusted when needed, and should incorporate feedback from impacted families.

Gretchen J. Cutler, PhD, MPH is a Scientific Investigator with the Children’s Minnesota Research Institute and an Affiliate Assistant Professor with the Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota.

Annual Sponsors