|
Printer
Friendly Version (PDF: 937KB / 12 pages)
Inside
this Issue:
- Medical
Home in Minnesota - A Year of Progress
- Clinic Works to Improve Treatment of Special Needs
- The Medical Home Index - A Measure of Improvements
- More Measures - The Family Medical Home Index - A Companion
to the Medical Home Index
- Rooting for the (Medical) Home Team
- A Medical Home Away From Home
Medical
Home in Minnesota - A Year of Progress
The
ideal that “every child should have a medical home” has
been taking hold in Minnesota over the past 18 months. In March
of 2004, eleven medical home teams came together as a learning
community to begin to take the many small steps that would
move them towards an ever higher level of “medical homeness.” Almost
without exception, the teams - each comprised of a physician,
parents of children with special health needs, and a practice
based nurse - bonded as a strong unit of change agents. At
the kick-off of the second year's learning collaborative, parents
who had been involved since the beginning all agreed that they
felt like valued members of a team that was making a difference
in the health care and lives of children with special health
care needs. Physician team leaders and the practice care coordinators
all said that without parent partners few if any of their successes
would have been realized.
At the publication
of this issue of Special Connections, the work and
the word have spread. Of the eleven original teams, all are continuing
in one form or another. An additional five teams started in September
of this year and are working alongside the veteran teams. More
teams are joining in January 2006.
In addition
to spread to new teams, some of the original practice teams have
implemented “spread” throughout their organizations.
In CentraCare Women's and Children Clinic in St. Cloud, the care
coordinator who began early in the team's process at 3 hours
per week working with the physician team leader champion, is
now more than 20 hours per week and is working with all the pediatricians
in the clinic developing care plans for CYSHCN. At most of the
clinics, the spread of the concept has gone beyond the original
physician champion. Some of the “spread" of medicalhome
is highlighted in this issue's articles.
At the state
level, exciting things are happening as well. With a new federal
grant from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (part of the
Health Resources Services Administration of the U.S. Department
of Human Services), the Minnesota Children with Special Health
Needs program (MCSHN) of the Minnesota Department of Health will
be continuing and expanding its work. The partnership between
MCSHN, Minnesota Academy of Pediatrics and PACER Center will
be expanded to include the Minnesota Department of Human Services.
and Wilder Research Center. The partners are working on spreading
the word on the benefits of Medical Home as well as studying
the cost impact of Medical Home. This issue of Special Connections brings
together various articles and data published about the first
year of work of the medical home learning collaborative. It has
been an exciting time for Medical Home in Minnesota.
“ When
families and their doctors work together to make comprehensive
care in the community a reality, this partnership is called
a Medical Home.”
Go
to the Table of Contents
Clinic
Works to Improve Treatment of Special Needs
Patients'
plans detail all aspects of their health, help them
get specialized care
By
Benjamin Malakoff
Staff St. Cloud Times Metro
bmalakoff@stcloudtimes.com
June 16, 2005 |

Picture of a CentraCare Parent Partner,
Ashley, with her daughter Camerynn. |
Lynette
Hurrle used to prepare a list of questions for the physician
at appointments for her son Jordon, 14, who was born with a
congenital defect that caused problems with his diaphragm.
She and the
doctor could only cover a few of those topics each time - she'd
have to wait until next time to cover others.
Now, CentraCare
Clinic is also in a national program's effort to improve care
for children with special needs.
The Medical
Home Project provides a care plan for each child - a comprehensive
document concerning his or her health care as a way to improve
it.
The plan will
feature a short history, list of medications, physician contact
information, areas of concern and other information.
It can be
used to help doctors and others become more familiar with a child's
needs.
Extra
attention
The care plans
will let care providers know that some children, such as Jordon,
need longer appointments so all concerns can be addressed.
“A lot
of times, you're on your own,” Hurrle said. “Different
doctors don't know us. If you don't have a care plan, you don't
know. We found that the care plan kind of backs you up.
Hurrle said
her husband wished the care plan was around when Jordon was born.
“When
a child goes to the ER or has an emergency, it allows providers
to deal with the child in each place,” said Emily Stevens,
directory of nursing for CentraCare Clinic. “It forces
the clinic to look at the true needs.”
Family-centered
The term “special
needs” has a wide-ranging definition that can be applied
to children with asthma, diabetes, autism, mental-health issues,
physical limitations, emotional problems or other conditions.
The Medical
Home Project began in Minnesota in 2004 with funding from several
organizations, including the Minnesota Department of Health.
The program
went national this year.
The goal is
an improvement in overall care and health, as evidenced by things
such as a reduction in emergency visits, missed school days and
unplanned medical visits, project facilitator Sandy Engdahl said.
“An
important part of this project is to involve parents of special-needs
children,” said Marilyn Peitso, a doctor helping to organize
the program.
Historically,
care providers told patients what they need.
“Now
(they) work with them,” Stevens said. In April, the group
had a dinner with eight families of special-needs children to
generate ideas to improve the project.
New
approach
Peitso said
medical care generally is structured to care for healthy people
while the project is attempting to make it more natural to care
for unhealthy ones. The challenge of the Medical Home Project
will be implementing it and integrating it into medical care
without interruption.
“These
changes are like changing a bicycle tire while still riding a
bicycle,” Peitso said.
CentraCare
Clinic has about 17,300 active patients, almost 2,300 of whom
- 13 percent - can be considered people with special needs, Peitso
said.
So far, 49
care plans have been written for special-needs children at CentraCare
Clinic.
There are
18 pediatric health providers at CentraCare Clinic, 17 of whom
are pediatricians.
Parents are
given copies of their child's care plan so they can show it to
care providers in case of an emergency. The care plans are also
provided to children's schools.
Specialists
who treat children with care plans are asked to fax forms back
to the clinic so the treatment can be recorded on the care plan.
“This
is a project that will never be completed,” Engdahl said.
She called it “completely fluid.”
Go
to the Table of Contents
The
Medical Home Index - A Measure of Improvements
Reprinted
with permission from Minnesota Pediatrician, Spring 2005
Written
by Ann Ricketts
It has been
a year since the Minnesota Chapter of the AAP, PACER Center and
the Minnesota Children with Special Health Needs Section of the
Minnesota Department of Health came together to work on the Minnesota
Medical Home Learning Collaborative. In mid-March of 2004, eleven
teams - each comprised of a physician, two parents and a care
coordinator/nurse - first met in a two-day learning session to
kick off a year long learning process to realize “medical
home improvements.” These eleven teams have met twice since
then in two-day learning sessions, linked by action periods in
between.
The American
Academy of Pediatrics has established access to high quality
health care through a medical home with appropriate reimbursement
to the pediatrician as its top priority. According to E. Stephen
Edwards, M.D., FAAP, Immediate Past President of American Academy
of Pediatrics, “We need not only the vision of the medical
home but also the demonstration of practical tools and methods
that have proved successful in overcoming recognized barriers
to providing care that is accessible, family centered, comprehensive,
continuous, coordinated, compassionate, and culturally effective.” ( Pediatrics , May
2004 Supplement).
One of the
practical tools used here in Minnesota was the Medical Home Index.
Carl Cooley, M.D., FAAP, and his co-director, Jeanne Mcallister,
M.S., M.H.A., of the Center for Medical Home Improvement (CMHI)
developed and validated a tool or index to measure the “medical
homeness” of practices providing care to children with
special health care needs - the Medical Home Index (MHI) - which
provides a point-in-time assessment of
the implementation of medical home elements.
The Medical
Home Index is a tool which very concretely, descriptively, and
explicitly gives a practice a sense of its degree of “medical
homeness.” For example, under the Chronic Condition Management
domain’s theme of “Identification of Children,” a
practice would decide whether it had achieved “partial” or “complete” success
in one of four levels.
Domain
2: Chronic Condition Management (CCM) : For CSHCN
and Their Families |
THEME: |
Level
1 |
Level
2 |
Level
3 |
Level
4 |
#2.1
Identification of Children in the Practice with Special
Health Care Needs
|
Children
with special health care needs (CSHCN) can be counted informally
(e.g. by memory or from recent acute encounter); comprehensive
identification can be done through individual chart review
only. |
Lists
of Children with special health care needs are extracted
electronically by diagnostic code. |
A CSHCN list
is generated by applying a definition, the list is used to
enhance care +/- or define practice activities
(e.g. to flag charts and computer databases for special attention
or identify the population and its subgroup) |
In
addition to Level 3, diagnostic codes for CSHCN are documented,
problem lists are current, and complexity levels are assigned
to each child; this information creates an accessible practice database. |
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
The overall
mean score of the eleven teams in March of 2004 was 3.13 out
of a total possible score of 8.00. Many of the physicians noted
that completing the Medical Home Index the first time was “depressing.” One
of the physicians noted that it was so disheartening to complete
the MHI the first time that she thought there should be a “warning” up
front. Reaching a score of eight seems almost a stratospheric
goal.
But in January
of 2005 when all the teams again completed the MHI, the picture
was brighter. The improvements were significant - a 42 percent
increase in the mean score overall for all the teams combined.
The chart below shows the changes between March of 2004 and January
of 2005 in each of the six domains. By percent improvement, the
changes for each domain were: 36 percent for Organizational Capacity,
34 percent for Chronic Condition Management, 50 percent for Care
Coordination, 50 percent for Community Outreach, 27 percent for
Data Management, and 94 percent for Quality Improvement.
There were some
themes where the improvement was greater than 60 percent, and in
one the increase was 126 percent. This latter improvement was in
the theme “Identification of children in the Practice with
Special Health Care Needs.” This was one of the lower scores
at the onset of March 2004. By January 2005, the new score was 5.09
- one of the highest.
One theme actually
decreased between learning sessions - “Supporting the Transition
of Adult Health Care Services.” This is an area that the
teams are only now developing action plans to address.
Other areas
were emphasized in the action periods between the learning sessions
- family partnerships, care plan development and care coordination,
communications with specialists and coordination and communications
with community organizations.
The scores
on the Care Coordination domain increased in many of the specific
themes; scores on the “Family Involvement” and “Care
Coordination/Role Definition” were each at 5.27 with greater
than 50 percent improvements in both. There was a 68 percent
improvement in the score for “Assessment of Needs/Plans
of Care” with a 2005 score of 5.18. The score on “Resource
Information and Referrals” improved significantly, but
started very low - it went from 2.25 to 3.82.
The highest score
on any item was a 5.45 for the theme, “Cooperative Management
Between Primary Care Provider and Specialist.”
Finally, one
of the greatest increases in scores between March of 2004 and
January of 2005 was for both the two themes in the Quality Improvement
Domain. There was a 99 percent increase in the “Quality
Activities (processes)” theme - from 2.33 to 4.64. The
teams moved from barely into Level 2 to solidly in Level 3. The
whole Medical Home Learning Collaborative process was clearly
a quality improvement process.
Domain
6: Quality Improvement/Change: For CSHCN and
Their Families |
THEME: |
Level
1 |
Level
2 |
Level
3 |
Level
4 |
#6.2
Quality Activities (processes)
|
Primary
care providers (PCPs) have completed courses or have
had an adequate orientation to continuous quality improvement
methods. |
Corporate
owners, administrators or payers identify practice deficits
and set goals for improvements; practice providers
and staff are identified to fix problems with limited participation
in the process. |
Periodic,
formal, and informal quality improvement activities gather
staff input about practice improvement ideas and
opportunities or CSHCN; efforts are made toward
related changes and improvements for this population. |
In
addition to Level 3, the practice systematically
learns about CSHCN and draws upon family input;
together the practice and families design and implement
office changes that address needs and gaps; they then study
their outcomes and set accordingly. |
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
PARTIAL
COMPLETE
|
For the eleven
teams who are participating in the Minnesota Medical Home Learning
Collaborative, the MHI will continue to be a helpful tool for
improvements. The 25 themes within the six domains will provide
a framework for improvement over more than a few years.
The Medical Home
Index is available for any practice that would like to assess itself,
as is the companion index for families - the Family Medical Home
Index. The tools are available to be downloaded from the website
for the Center for Medical Home Improvement - www.medicalhomeimprovement.org.
Go
to the Table of Contents
More
Measures - The Family Medical Home Index - A Companion to the
Medical Home Index
Written
by Ann Ricketts
The Family
Medical Home Index (FMHI), which measures the organization and
delivery of primary are for children with special health needs
from parent points of view, was given to parents both before
the first medical home collaborative meeting and then at the
end of the third session ten months later. The FMHI is a companion
tool alongside the Medical Home Index.
There were
15 respondents to the first mailing of the FMHI and ten to the
second mailing in early January of 2005.
In both surveys,
questions about the quality, concern and care shown by the primary
care provider were ranked very high. All the respondents on both
surveys said “yes” to the statement: “From
my experience, I believe that my primary care provider (PCP)
and the staff and his/her office have a commitment to provide
the quality care and family supports that we need.”
There were many
questions where the average of all the answers increased on the second
set of questionnaires by more than 15%. Specifically, the questions
which had the greatest percentage increases in the average of the
scores between 1 (Never) and 4 (Always) increased were as follows:
“My
primary care provider (PCP) uses helpful ways to communicate
. . . with my child.” 27% increase from 3.0 to 3.8
“My
PCP asks me to share with him/her my knowledge and expertise
as the parent or caregiver of a child with special health care
needs (CSHCN).” 16% increase from 3.1 to 3.6.
“I
am asked by our PCP how my child’s condition affects
our family (e.g. the impact on siblings, the time my child's
care takes, lost sleep, extra expenses, etc.).” 20%
increase from 2.1 to 2.4.
“Planning
of care for my child includes the writing down of key information
(e.g. recommendations, treatments, phone#).” 17%
increase from 3.0 to 3.5.
“Planning
of care for my child includes setting short term goals (e.g.
for the next three months).” 23% increase from 2.6
to 3.2.
It was the
statement -“My primary care provider and staff work with
our family to create a written care plan for my child” -
that had the greatest percent increase - from 1.7 to 2.7. More
significantly, only four of the 15 respondents to the first survey
responded that they that they received a copy of their child's
plan at all, while all of the ten respondents in January of 2005
said they had received a copy. Two of the first time responders
who said they had a written plan were parents with North Point
Clinic and they were not represented on the second survey.
This was very
exciting news. The care plan definitely has been taking hold
with the practices.
There were
some areas where scores actually went down. The statement - “My
PCP has a staff person or a “care coordinator” who
will help each person involved in my child's care to communicate
with each other” - went from a 4 to a 3. This result may
well reflect a change in expectations between knowing nothing
about medical home, and spending almost a year involved in making
changes to a system. That statement was actually a several-part
question. There was a 24 percent increase (from 2.5
to 3.1) in the statements about the care coordinator who will “help
to find needed services (e.g. transportation, durable equipment
and home care) and “make sure that the planning care meets
my child and my families' needs.”)
The ability
of a care coordinator or other staff person to “help each
person involved in my child's care to communicate with each other” is
a work in progress and very much part of the current year's work.
The only other
area where there were drops in scores was on the yes or no statement, “Office
staff help me to connect with family support organizations and informational
resources in our community and state.” This is an area that
the teams have already identified as an area in need of attention.
At the Learning Session in January of 2006, a time will be devoted
to helping practices and families work together to identify family
to family support systems.
Go
to the Table of Contents
Rooting
for the (Medical) Home Team
Early
Childhood Connection, A Newsletter for Minnesota Families
of Young Children with Disabilities, Winter 2005
Used
with permission from PACER Center Inc. Minneapolis, MN, (952)
838-9000.
www.pacer.org. All rights
reserved.
The “medical
home” team is a new approach that provides high-quality,
family-centered health care services to children with chronic
health needs.
When Alaina
Butcher, now 4 years old, was born prematurely and with complex
health needs, her parents faced challenges from the health care
system they thought would help them. As Jenny and Kevin Butcher
of Watertown, Minn., learned how to provide complicated care
for their new baby, they found they also needed to understand
medical jargon, juggle appointments with specialists, and navigate
roadblocks to Alaina's care. Chief among those roadblocks were
a lack of coordination among the baby's physicians and the failure
of some in the medical community to recognize the family as partners
in their daughter's care.
Therese and
Ted Salonek of Montrose, Minn., had similar difficulties when
their daughter, Hope, now 8, was born with Down syndrome and
medical needs. Though many of Hope's health care issues are now
resolved, Therese remembers how difficult their experiences were.
Serving children with chronic health needs in traditional clinic
settings is like “fitting square pegs in round holes,” she
said.
The Butchers
and the Saloneks both wished they could do something to help
improve the system and make life easier for other families who
have children with chronic health needs. Then, their pediatrician
asked them to participate in something called the Minnesota Medical
Home Project. The year-old effort is part of a medical home grant
through the Minnesota Children with Special Health Needs program
at the Minnesota Department of Health.
The grant,
provided by the federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau, helps
11 medical-home teams based in clinics across the state. Its
purpose is two-fold: 1) to improve the quality of care provided
to children with special health care needs and disabilities at
local clinics; and 2) to discover how the medical home concept
can bring comprehensive and competent care to all children.
The two families
began to learn more about the project. A “medical home,” they
discovered, is a way to provide high-quality, family-centered
health care services. It is an approach where the primary care
doctor, a clinic care coordinator, and the family have a trusting
relationship. They work together to coordinate specialty care,
educational services, out-of-home care, family support, and other
public and private community services that are important to the
overall health of the child and family.
The project
was just the kind of opportunity the two families sought. Their
pediatrician, Dr. Kathy Sweetman at Lakeview Clinic in Watertown,
leads one of the 11 medical home teams. Jenny Butcher and Therese
Salonek were happy to join. Sweetman's team began with three
goals:
- To help
families feel supported in the medical arena, especially families
that need to see their doctor often because of their child's
chronic illness;
- To improve
collaboration among the child's medical professionals, school,
and community; and
- To connect
families to resources within their communities.
Soon, the
team invited Kate Fasching, an early childhood special education
teacher in the Waconia school district, to join them. Fasching
had just finished a paper on medical home and family-centered
care issues for her master's degree. Team members liked the idea
of connecting the medical team and the school. It provides better
care and services to the child, Fasching explained.
“I feel
that often we are not catching developmental delays in children
early enough,” she added. “Sometimes, their delays
are not discovered until their preschool or kindergarten screening.
The medical home is not about saying that someone isn't doing
their job, it's about what is best for the child and the child's
family, and how we can diagnose disabilities at an earlier age.” Through
the broad expertise of its members, Sweetman's team is achieving
impressive results. They have created everything from comprehensive
records, to conferences, to support groups. Among their achievements:
- Shared
records. The team developed a system to include
all of the child's records-from the doctor's office to the
school and beyond. The combined record can be copied for
all the child's service and medical providers. It includes
information on specialists, their phone numbers, and diagnoses
made. This information is especially important when a child's
medication changes frequently, said Sweetman. Eventually,
the paper record will be transferred to a computer system,
so it can be easily updated and sent electronically to all
service providers upon the parent's request.
- User-friendly
clinics. The team worked to make the Lakeview Clinic
more user-friendly. Parents of children with chronic needs
used to call the clinic, then wait for staff to pull the
child's record before they received a response from the doctor.
Now, clinic staff immediately transfers them to their child's
doctor or nurse to see if the concern can be addressed over
the telephone. “This was suggested by the parents on
the team and has proved to be a very patientfriendly move,” Sweetman
said.
- Family-centered
care approach. The team also worked to improve the
family-centered care approach of clinic staff on the telephones.
Training included teaching them what kinds of questions to
ask the parents when they call.
- Conference
for physicians and the community. To help physicians
better identify developmental delays in some children, the
team will conduct a conference for physicians and the community
this spring. It will include speakers on early intervention,
screening tools, problem-solving techniques, and discussion
about compensation-who is going to pay for the medical home
and services.
In the months
ahead, the team also plans to reach out in other ways. They expect
to develop printed handouts and brochures on the medical home
approach, what it means to the community, and how physicians
can practice it. They also want to find ways to connect children
with special health needs to community resources, including county
and other professionals who can provide needed services to families
and children. Other plans include creating support groups for
families of children with disabilities and developing better
collaboration between the doctor's office and the school.
Team members
are pleased with their efforts. Jenny Butcher sees having a computerized
care plan for Alaina as a major benefit. Having her daughter's
comprehensive records-from information about the family's insurance,
to Alaina's allergies, to procedures to avoid-will take much
anxiety out of emergency trips to the clinic or hospital, she
said. Both mothers said direct access to the physician or nurse
will improve care to children.
“We do not
have our care plans working perfectly,” Sweetman noted. “They
require many hours and continuous correction, but we have made significant
progress."
Go
to the Table of Contents
A
Medical Home Away From Home
Written
with permission from THE JOURNAL, New Ulm, June 27, 2005
(Health Section)
Picture
of Marion Aiken and daughter Amanda. Marion is part of the
New Ulm Medical Center Medical Home Initiative.
A New Ulm
team's commitment to a national program aimed at streamlining
and coordinating care for medically needy children has won national
recognition.
New Ulm resident
Marion Aiken didn't ask for her beloved daughter Amanda to be
born with special health care needs.
But 12 years
ago when Amanda was born at only 31 weeks gestation due to a
fetal maternal hemorrhage - the infant had lost almost all of
her blood through her umbilical cord, which had failed to attach
securely to the placenta - she had a myriad of health concerns.
All of her
major organs had shut down and her lungs were beginning to crystallize.
She had an actual birth weight of 2 pounds, 5 ounces and was
immediately put on a respirator.
“You
feel so helpless,” Marion said. “You hope and pray
that they are healthy and have 10 fingers and 10 toes and it
doesn't happen and you say, ‘Oh boy, what are we going
to do?’”
Thanks to
top-notch health care from doctors at Abbott Northwestern and
Children's hospitals In the Twin Cities, Amanda survived. With
ongoing care at Gillette Children's Hospital and New Ulm Medical
Center for cerebral palsy, pervasive developmental disorders,
cognitive delays, asthma and other problems, she is thriving
today.
But the years
have been a roller coaster ride for Marion and her husband, John.
Many times,
those bumps came in the form of frustrations caused by a lack
of communication between multiple health care providers in different
communities, difficulties coordinating care for her daughter
and spending time explaining Amanda's condition over and over
again to each new physician.
Lately, however,
the Aikens' ride has smoothed out significantly.
A program,
undertaken by New Ulm Medical Center pediatrician Dr. Clifford
Wu, is helping hundreds of parents whose children have special
health care needs experience continuity in their health care
that has been lacking.
The Medical
Home Initiative, sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Health
and the Minnesota Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics,
aims to bring together ideas from a contingent of 11 medical
facilities state-wide in a collaborative effort to provide patients
with a medical “home” no matter where they receive
health care.
“It's
the idea that every child deserves a medical home,” Wu
said. “It's a conceptual place where a child can receive
comprehensive, coordinated and compassionate care. But it's not
just the child; it's the child's family that is impacted. The
emphasis of the program is on children with special health care
needs those with genetic defects, chronic illnesses, heart problems,
diabetes, arthritis and even asthma.”
Some of the
aspects of the multi-faceted initiative include the creation
of emergency care plans for the approximately 200 children with
special health care needs seen at the medical center; development
of a communication system that gives out-of-town specialists
a device to immediately communicate changes in a child's care
to Dr. Wu; assistance for parents to coordinate appointments,
both locally and far away; and priority access to Dr. Wu at set
times throughout the day.
“What
the medical home means for us as a family, is a coordination
of care,” said Aiken, who belongs to the medical center's
medical home initiative committee along with Wu, fellow parent
Clair Gieske and Cindy Wellner, clinic LPN.
“It
is giving my daughter and our family support in the medical arena
where there has always been a gap. Dr. Wu has given us the opportunity
to do more at home in New Ulm and we have the continuity now.”
The continuity
is epitomized by and experience Amanda had in May. She was being
seen by one of here many doctors at Gillette Children's Hospital
in St. Paul for a problem in the area of her spinal column. That
doctor asked the Aikins if Amanda had ever had a CT scan. Aiken
said she had one performed recently and, in fact had a copy of
the report and images on a CD-Rom, which was created by medical
center staff expressly for the Aikens and filled with fundamental
information from Amanda's medical record.
“That
doctor was able to sit and look at the image and said it was
just awesome; he was blown away.” Marion said. “He
knew the results then and there, didn't have to order another
CT scan for Amanda and we knew the next course of action without
it taking days."
“Not only
did she avoid duplicate procedures and tests, but we got our answers
immediately. It's the worst feeling, waiting for days for doctors
to look at the test results and tell us what we need to do, because
you don't know how your life will have changed by then. I can't even
put into words how excited I am about this, how well it's working
out. It's like Christmas, you keep discovering new things to get
excited about.”
Go
to the Table of Contents
The
Minnesota Medical Home Project (Minnesota Medical Home
Collaborative) is a partnership between The Minnesota Department
of Health, the Minnesota Academy of Pediatrics Foundation
and PACER Center/Family Voices of Minnesota.
The
Minnesota Medical Home Learning Collaborative would not
be possible without all the pioneering work of the Maternal
and Child Health Bureau, the American Academy of Pediatrics,
the Center for Medical Home Improvement, and the National
Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality. The Minnesota
Project has based its work on the National Medical Home
Learning Collaborative, recently finishing one year of
work. |
This Project
is made possible through a grant from MCHB - Contract Number
1 H02MC00101-3
The staff person
for the Minnesota Medical Home Learning Collaborative is:
Carolyn Allshouse
Medical Home Coordinator
MDH-MCSHN
P.O. Box 64882
St. Paul, MN 55164-0882
651-281-9970
carolyn.allshouse@health.state.mn.us
Go
to the Table of Contents
|